Indirect Discrimination
Indirect Discrimination
Start automating your HR Tasks
Automate processes, validate data, access DE&l insights, deliver the best employee experience
Book a demo
Indirect Discrimination in the UK
Indirect Discrimination in the UK
Understanding UK Discrimination Framework
The Equality Act 2010 gives a comprehensive legal protection against unlawful discrimination based on nine protected characteristics:
Age
Disability
Gender reassignment
Marriage and civil partnership
Pregnancy and maternity
Race
Religion or belief
Sex (gender)
Sexual orientation
Note: Indirect discrimination provisions apply to eight of these characteristics; discrimination related to pregnancy and maternity is always classified as direct discrimination.
This legislation makes it unlawful to discriminate against individuals based on these named characteristics. HR teams and departments play a crucial role in ensuring organizational compliance while fostering an inclusive workplace culture that goes beyond mere legal requirements.
Defining Indirect Discrimination
Indirect discrimination occurs when a seemingly neutral policy, criterion, or practice applies equally to everyone but creates a particular disadvantage or discriminatory impact for people with certain protected characteristics. Crucially, this form of discrimination often happens without conscious intent, unlike direct discrimination which involves intentional disparate treatment.
It's important to understand that a "workplace policy" in this context isn't limited to formal written documents. It encompasses:
Formal policies and procedures
Unwritten workplace rules and conventions
Established workplace practices
Organizational norms and "the way things are done"
Decision-making criteria in the hiring process
The key distinction is that indirect discrimination emerges from treating everyone the same way when equal treatment produces unequal outcomes or disproportionate impact due to different circumstances or characteristics.
Indirect discrimination occurs when a seemingly neutral policy, criterion, or practice applies equally to everyone but creates a particular disadvantage or discriminatory impact for people with certain protected characteristics. Crucially, this form of discrimination often happens without conscious intent, unlike direct discrimination which involves intentional disparate treatment.
It's important to understand that a "workplace policy" in this context isn't limited to formal written documents. It encompasses:
Formal policies and procedures
Unwritten workplace rules and conventions
Established workplace practices
Organizational norms and "the way things are done"
Decision-making criteria in the hiring process
The key distinction is that indirect discrimination emerges from treating everyone the same way when equal treatment produces unequal outcomes or disproportionate impact due to different circumstances or characteristics.
Distinguishing Between Discrimination Types
Understanding the differences between various types of discrimination helps HR professionals identify and address each appropriately:
Direct Discrimination
Direct discrimination occurs when someone is explicitly treated less favorably because of a protected characteristic. For example, refusing to hire qualified job applicants over 50 would constitute direct age discrimination.
With very limited exceptions (primarily involving age in roles requiring exceptional physical fitness), direct discrimination cannot be legally justified and often leads to discrimination claims.
Indirect Discrimination
Indirect discrimination happens when a universal policy or neutral rule disproportionately disadvantages people with particular protected characteristics, even without intended bias. This form of discrimination can sometimes be harder to identify than direct workplace discrimination.
Unlike direct discrimination, indirect discrimination can potentially be legally justified if the organization can demonstrate "objective justification", that the policy represents a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim", meaning there must be a genuine business need that cannot reasonably be achieved through less discriminatory alternatives.
Discrimination by Association
This occurs when someone faces unfair treatment because of their connection to someone with a protected characteristic. For example, if an employee experiences negative treatment because they have caregiving responsibilities for disabled people in their family.
Discrimination by Perception
Discrimination by perception happens when someone experiences disadvantage because they are perceived (correctly or incorrectly) to have a protected characteristic. For instance, if someone faces a hostile work environment based on a colleague's assumption about their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Understanding the differences between various types of discrimination helps HR professionals identify and address each appropriately:
Direct Discrimination
Direct discrimination occurs when someone is explicitly treated less favorably because of a protected characteristic. For example, refusing to hire qualified job applicants over 50 would constitute direct age discrimination.
With very limited exceptions (primarily involving age in roles requiring exceptional physical fitness), direct discrimination cannot be legally justified and often leads to discrimination claims.
Indirect Discrimination
Indirect discrimination happens when a universal policy or neutral rule disproportionately disadvantages people with particular protected characteristics, even without intended bias. This form of discrimination can sometimes be harder to identify than direct workplace discrimination.
Unlike direct discrimination, indirect discrimination can potentially be legally justified if the organization can demonstrate "objective justification", that the policy represents a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim", meaning there must be a genuine business need that cannot reasonably be achieved through less discriminatory alternatives.
Discrimination by Association
This occurs when someone faces unfair treatment because of their connection to someone with a protected characteristic. For example, if an employee experiences negative treatment because they have caregiving responsibilities for disabled people in their family.
Discrimination by Perception
Discrimination by perception happens when someone experiences disadvantage because they are perceived (correctly or incorrectly) to have a protected characteristic. For instance, if someone faces a hostile work environment based on a colleague's assumption about their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Workplace Examples Across Protected Characteristics
Indirect discrimination can show up in various ways across different protected characteristics:
Religious Discrimination Example
A company policy requires all staff to work on Saturdays during peak season. While this neutral rule applies uniformly to all employees, it creates a particular disadvantage for Jewish employees whose religious beliefs prohibit work on Saturdays (Shabbat).
Unless the employer can demonstrate objective justification that this scheduling requirement represents a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, and that no reasonable adjustments are possible, this could constitute indirect discrimination related to religious beliefs.
Racial Discrimination Example
A job advertisement specifies that candidates must have English as their first language. While this requirement applies to all applicants equally, it disproportionately disadvantages people from certain racial backgrounds or national origin.
A more appropriate requirement might focus on the actual need, demonstrated proficiency in English communication, rather than specifying English as a first language, which is unnecessary for job performance and creates a discriminatory policy against non-native speakers.
Gender Discrimination Example
A workplace rule requires all employees to work full-time with no flexibility options. This seemingly neutral policy may disproportionately disadvantage women, who statistically remain more likely to have primary caregiving responsibilities.
If flexible working arrangements or hybrid working could reasonably accommodate business needs, the inflexible policy could constitute indirect sex discrimination by failing to account for these different circumstances and creating a negative impact on female employees.
Indirect discrimination can show up in various ways across different protected characteristics:
Religious Discrimination Example
A company policy requires all staff to work on Saturdays during peak season. While this neutral rule applies uniformly to all employees, it creates a particular disadvantage for Jewish employees whose religious beliefs prohibit work on Saturdays (Shabbat).
Unless the employer can demonstrate objective justification that this scheduling requirement represents a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, and that no reasonable adjustments are possible, this could constitute indirect discrimination related to religious beliefs.
Racial Discrimination Example
A job advertisement specifies that candidates must have English as their first language. While this requirement applies to all applicants equally, it disproportionately disadvantages people from certain racial backgrounds or national origin.
A more appropriate requirement might focus on the actual need, demonstrated proficiency in English communication, rather than specifying English as a first language, which is unnecessary for job performance and creates a discriminatory policy against non-native speakers.
Gender Discrimination Example
A workplace rule requires all employees to work full-time with no flexibility options. This seemingly neutral policy may disproportionately disadvantage women, who statistically remain more likely to have primary caregiving responsibilities.
If flexible working arrangements or hybrid working could reasonably accommodate business needs, the inflexible policy could constitute indirect sex discrimination by failing to account for these different circumstances and creating a negative impact on female employees.
Create a better place of work today
Create a better place of work today
Simplify your people workflows and bring value to everyone in the organisation. Try Humaans today.
Simplify your people workflows and bring value to everyone in the organisation. Try Humaans today.
HR's Role in Preventing Indirect Discrimination
Human Resources professionals play a critical role in identifying and preventing all these forms of discrimination:
Policy Development and Review
Regularly audit existing policies, practices, and criteria for potential discriminatory impact
Consider several diverse perspectives when developing new policies
Implement equality impact assessments for significant organizational changes
Document justifications for potentially disadvantageous requirements
Take a proactive approach to identifying problematic workplace rules
Recruitment and Selection
Review job descriptions and person specifications for unnecessarily exclusionary language
Ensure selection criteria focus on genuine occupational requirements
Train hiring managers to recognize and mitigate unconscious bias
Monitor recruitment outcomes across protected characteristics
Maintain a detailed record of hiring decisions to defend against potential discrimination complaints
Workplace Accommodations
Develop clear processes for requesting reasonable adjustments for individuals with disabilities
Train managers to handle accommodation requests appropriately
Document accommodation decisions and justifications
Regularly review the effectiveness of implemented adjustments
Handling Discrimination Complaints
Create accessible processes for raising concerns about discrimination
Investigate complaints thoroughly and objectively
Maintain detailed records of discrimination allegations and responses
Implement appropriate remedial actions when discrimination is identified
Seek legal advice or legal counsel when addressing complex discrimination issues
Human Resources professionals play a critical role in identifying and preventing all these forms of discrimination:
Policy Development and Review
Regularly audit existing policies, practices, and criteria for potential discriminatory impact
Consider several diverse perspectives when developing new policies
Implement equality impact assessments for significant organizational changes
Document justifications for potentially disadvantageous requirements
Take a proactive approach to identifying problematic workplace rules
Recruitment and Selection
Review job descriptions and person specifications for unnecessarily exclusionary language
Ensure selection criteria focus on genuine occupational requirements
Train hiring managers to recognize and mitigate unconscious bias
Monitor recruitment outcomes across protected characteristics
Maintain a detailed record of hiring decisions to defend against potential discrimination complaints
Workplace Accommodations
Develop clear processes for requesting reasonable adjustments for individuals with disabilities
Train managers to handle accommodation requests appropriately
Document accommodation decisions and justifications
Regularly review the effectiveness of implemented adjustments
Handling Discrimination Complaints
Create accessible processes for raising concerns about discrimination
Investigate complaints thoroughly and objectively
Maintain detailed records of discrimination allegations and responses
Implement appropriate remedial actions when discrimination is identified
Seek legal advice or legal counsel when addressing complex discrimination issues
Business Case for Addressing Unconscious Bias
Beyond legal compliance, addressing indirect discrimination delivers significant business benefits:
Performance and Innovation: Research consistently demonstrates that diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones. For example, Boston Consulting Group found that companies with above-average management team diversity reported 19% higher innovation revenue. Diverse perspectives foster creative problem-solving and better decision-making, while an inclusive workplace allows all employees to contribute their full potential.
Talent Acquisition and Retention: Organizations known for inclusive practices attract wider talent pools and retain valuable employees longer. This reduces recruitment costs while preserving institutional knowledge and maintaining productivity.
Market Understanding: Workforce diversity helps organizations better understand and serve diverse customer bases, creating competitive advantages in increasingly global marketplaces.
Reputational Benefits: Companies demonstrating genuine commitment to equality enjoy enhanced brand perception among consumers, partners, and potential employees increasingly concerned with organizational values.
Legal Standards for Discrimination Claims
Understanding the legal framework helps HR professionals evaluate potential discrimination issues proactively:
Evidence Requirements
According to guidance from organizations like Citizens Advice, employees filing discrimination claims must demonstrate:
The existence of a provision, criterion, or practice applied universally
That the provision places people sharing their protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage
That they personally experience that disadvantage
That the employer cannot show sufficient objective justification for the provision
While direct evidence of discrimination is ideal, circumstantial evidence can also support discrimination claims when patterns of unfair treatment are established.
Objective Justification Defense
When potentially discriminatory policies are necessary, organizations must demonstrate:
A legitimate aim (genuine business need rather than cost alone)
Proportionality (the approach is appropriate and necessary)
Consideration of less discriminatory alternatives
Documentation of the decision-making process
Time Limits for Legal Action
In discrimination cases, "the legal time limit is three months less one day from the last act of discrimination." These relatively short time limits make prompt identification and resolution of potential discrimination issues particularly important.
Organizational Training Considerations
While not legally mandated, training on types of discrimination represents best practice for organizations committed to inclusive workplaces:
Training Benefits
Increases awareness of unconscious bias and its potential impacts
Provides practical tools for identifying potentially discriminatory situations
Empowers managers to make more inclusive decisions
Creates shared language and expectations around equality
Training Approaches
Integrate indirect discrimination concepts into broader equality and diversity training
Provide role-specific guidance for managers, recruiters, and policy developers
Use realistic case studies relevant to your organization's context
Reinforce learning through ongoing discussions and resources for employees
Implementation Considerations
Tailor content to organizational needs and industry-specific challenges
Ensure senior leadership participation and endorsement
Measure training effectiveness through knowledge assessments and behavior change
Provide refresher training and updates on evolving best practices
Business Implications of Discrimination Issues
Failure to address indirect discrimination carries significant organizational risks:
Financial Consequences: Employment tribunal awards for discrimination claims have no upper limit, potentially resulting in substantial financial penalties. Additional costs include legal fees, settlement payments, and remedial actions.
Workplace Culture Impact: Employees experiencing discrimination often feel "violated, shamed, and intimidated." These experiences create an offensive environment, damage morale, reduce engagement, and increase turnover throughout the organization.
Reputational Damage: Discrimination claims, particularly those reaching public tribunals, can severely damage organizational reputation. In today's connected environment, such incidents can quickly become highly visible, affecting customer relationships, partnerships, and recruitment.
Legal Challenges: Organizations face potential legal action and significant legal challenges when discrimination occurs, requiring extensive resources to defend against claims.
Operational Disruption: Addressing discrimination claims diverts significant management attention and organizational resources from core business activities, creating opportunity costs beyond direct financial penalties.
Proactive identification and prevention of indirect discrimination not only fulfills legal obligations but protects organizational culture, reputation, and track record. By implementing thoughtful policies, providing appropriate training, and fostering inclusive practices, HR professionals can help their organizations avoid these significant risks while creating environments where all employees can thrive regardless of protected characteristics.
Beyond legal compliance, addressing indirect discrimination delivers significant business benefits:
Performance and Innovation: Research consistently demonstrates that diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones. For example, Boston Consulting Group found that companies with above-average management team diversity reported 19% higher innovation revenue. Diverse perspectives foster creative problem-solving and better decision-making, while an inclusive workplace allows all employees to contribute their full potential.
Talent Acquisition and Retention: Organizations known for inclusive practices attract wider talent pools and retain valuable employees longer. This reduces recruitment costs while preserving institutional knowledge and maintaining productivity.
Market Understanding: Workforce diversity helps organizations better understand and serve diverse customer bases, creating competitive advantages in increasingly global marketplaces.
Reputational Benefits: Companies demonstrating genuine commitment to equality enjoy enhanced brand perception among consumers, partners, and potential employees increasingly concerned with organizational values.
Legal Standards for Discrimination Claims
Understanding the legal framework helps HR professionals evaluate potential discrimination issues proactively:
Evidence Requirements
According to guidance from organizations like Citizens Advice, employees filing discrimination claims must demonstrate:
The existence of a provision, criterion, or practice applied universally
That the provision places people sharing their protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage
That they personally experience that disadvantage
That the employer cannot show sufficient objective justification for the provision
While direct evidence of discrimination is ideal, circumstantial evidence can also support discrimination claims when patterns of unfair treatment are established.
Objective Justification Defense
When potentially discriminatory policies are necessary, organizations must demonstrate:
A legitimate aim (genuine business need rather than cost alone)
Proportionality (the approach is appropriate and necessary)
Consideration of less discriminatory alternatives
Documentation of the decision-making process
Time Limits for Legal Action
In discrimination cases, "the legal time limit is three months less one day from the last act of discrimination." These relatively short time limits make prompt identification and resolution of potential discrimination issues particularly important.
Organizational Training Considerations
While not legally mandated, training on types of discrimination represents best practice for organizations committed to inclusive workplaces:
Training Benefits
Increases awareness of unconscious bias and its potential impacts
Provides practical tools for identifying potentially discriminatory situations
Empowers managers to make more inclusive decisions
Creates shared language and expectations around equality
Training Approaches
Integrate indirect discrimination concepts into broader equality and diversity training
Provide role-specific guidance for managers, recruiters, and policy developers
Use realistic case studies relevant to your organization's context
Reinforce learning through ongoing discussions and resources for employees
Implementation Considerations
Tailor content to organizational needs and industry-specific challenges
Ensure senior leadership participation and endorsement
Measure training effectiveness through knowledge assessments and behavior change
Provide refresher training and updates on evolving best practices
Business Implications of Discrimination Issues
Failure to address indirect discrimination carries significant organizational risks:
Financial Consequences: Employment tribunal awards for discrimination claims have no upper limit, potentially resulting in substantial financial penalties. Additional costs include legal fees, settlement payments, and remedial actions.
Workplace Culture Impact: Employees experiencing discrimination often feel "violated, shamed, and intimidated." These experiences create an offensive environment, damage morale, reduce engagement, and increase turnover throughout the organization.
Reputational Damage: Discrimination claims, particularly those reaching public tribunals, can severely damage organizational reputation. In today's connected environment, such incidents can quickly become highly visible, affecting customer relationships, partnerships, and recruitment.
Legal Challenges: Organizations face potential legal action and significant legal challenges when discrimination occurs, requiring extensive resources to defend against claims.
Operational Disruption: Addressing discrimination claims diverts significant management attention and organizational resources from core business activities, creating opportunity costs beyond direct financial penalties.
Proactive identification and prevention of indirect discrimination not only fulfills legal obligations but protects organizational culture, reputation, and track record. By implementing thoughtful policies, providing appropriate training, and fostering inclusive practices, HR professionals can help their organizations avoid these significant risks while creating environments where all employees can thrive regardless of protected characteristics.
Trusted by global organisations
Trusted by global organisations
Create a better place of work today
Create a better place of work today
Simplify your people workflows and bring value to everyone in the organisation. Experience Humaans today.
Simplify your people workflows and bring value to everyone in the organisation. Experience Humaans today.
